Skip to main content

Microsoft Faces Tough Sell For Sender ID

Microsoft Corp. on Tuesday claimed rapid adoption of its Sender ID framework for email authentication to fight spam, but at least one analyst firm said the software maker is waging an uphill battle in the industry.

On the eve of the second annual Email Authentication Summit in Chicago, Microsoft got the market machine humming for Sender ID, claiming its adoption has increased in March to 21 percent of Fortune 500 companies, compared with 7 percent the same month a year ago.

Sender ID uses Microsoft's proprietary Purported Responsible Address method for checking the headers with a message body to verify the legitimacy of the domain name from which an email is sent. Sender ID also supports the Sender Policy Framework Classic method, which looks only at envelope headers outside the message body; but the authentication system generally implies the PRA method.

The connection to Microsoft's proprietary technology has left email and Internet service providers reluctant to adopt Sender ID. As a result, Sender ID has had a "more limited pickup" in the industry then rival email-authentication technologies, such as DomainKeys Identified Mail, which is favored by Yahoo Inc. (Nasdaq:YHOO - news), the largest email provider; and network supplier Cisco Systems Inc., analyst Arabella Hallawell of Gartner Inc. said

"We think that DKIM has the most potential," Hallawell said, adding, however, that DKIM is the most difficult to implement and is a ways from getting approval by the Internet Engineering Task Force.

As expected, one place Sender ID has seen an increase in use is on Microsoft's Hotmail, the Web mail service provided by the company's MSN portal. Since January, MSN has seen an increase in Sender ID-compliant email to nearly 32 percent from 20 percent, Microsoft says.

That's no surprise to Hallawell, since companies and marketers sending bulk email through MSN would find it easier to get Sender ID-compliant messages through Microsoft's spam filters.

"MSN hasn't make it mandatory for you to send email using Sender ID, but one would say it might weigh in your favor," Hallawell said.

Indeed, Microsoft says Sender ID email sent over MSN show an 80 percent reduction in getting snared by filters, compared with other non-spam email.

Despite that success rate, Yahoo remains uninterested in Sender ID.

"Yahoo is continuing to focus on DomainKeys and DKIM," a spokeswoman said. "We feel confident that there is widespread industry agreement that a cryptographic solution is the best long-term solution for the mail-authentication issue."

DomainKeys is an email authentication method that computes a digital signature, which is added to the message header. The receiving mail server obtains the sender's public key from the domain name system to validate the signature. Yahoo has used DomainKeys since 2004.

Microsoft declined to speculate on whether Sender ID would someday play a leading role in the email-authentication market or end up a supporting actor.

"I don't have a crystal ball," Craig Spiezle, director of the Technology Care and Safety Group at Microsoft, said.

One authentication method would certainly be easier for companies and marketers, but it's too early to say how the market will evolve, Hallawell said.

"That's obviously the bigger picture," she said. "One standard would be better, but that obviously hasn't been the case. Each provider is trying to mark off their own territory."

In addition to pushing Sender ID, Microsoft took advantage of the upcoming summit to unveil a new batch of MSN Postmaster Services, which provides tools and best practices that help email senders work within the portal's email filtering technologies.

The tools include a reporting program that lets organizations see the email messages from their networks that were sent to a junk mail folder. In addition, MSN provides reports on how email filters are processing messages, and guidelines for improving deliverability through Hotmail and Windows Live Mail.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

US says world safer, despite 11,000 attacks in '05

The U.S. war on terrorism has made the world safer, the State Department's counterterrorism chief said on Friday, despite more than 11,000 terrorist attacks worldwide last year that killed 14,600 people. The U.S. State Department said the numbers, listed in its annual Country Reports on Terrorism released on Friday, were based on a broader definition of terrorism and could not be compared to the 3,129 international attacks listed the previous year. But the new 2005 figures, which showed attacks in Iraq jumped and accounted for about a third of the world's total, may fuel criticism of the Bush administration's assertion that it is winning the fight against terrorism. Asked if the world was safer than the previous year, U.S. State Department Counterterrorism Coordinator Henry Crumpton told a news conference, "I think so. But I think that (if) you look at the ups and downs of this battle, it's going to take us a long time to win this. You can't measure this month ...

Al-Qaeda number two in new video

Al-Qaeda's number two Ayman al-Zawahiri has appeared in a video saying that Iraqi insurgents have "broken the back" of the US military. He praised "martyrdom operations" carried out by al-Qaeda in Iraq in the video, posted on an Islamist website. And he called on the people and army of Pakistan to fight against President Musharraf's administration. This is the third message from prominent al-Qaeda leaders to emerge within a week. A tape from Osama Bin Laden was broadcast on 23 April, followed two days later by a message from Iraqi insurgent Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Pakistan focus Zawahiri, who wore a black turban and a white robe in the video, described the leaders of Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Iraq as traitors, and urged Muslims to "confront them". He praised Iraqi militants, saying that the US, Britain and allies had "achieved nothing but losses, disasters and misfortunes" in Iraq. "Al-Qaeda in Iraq alone has carried out 800 ma...

Does light have mass?

The short answer is "no", but it is a qualified "no" because there are odd ways of interpreting the question which could justify the answer "yes". Light is composed of photons so we could ask if the photon has mass. The answer is then definitely "no": The photon is a massless particle. According to theory it has energy and momentum but no mass and this is confirmed by experiment to within strict limits. Even before it was known that light is composed of photons it was known that light carries momentum and will exert a pressure on a surface. This is not evidence that it has mass since momentum can exist without mass. [ For details see the Physics FAQ article What is the mass of the photon? ]. Sometimes people like to say that the photon does have mass because a photon has energy E = hf where h is Planck's constant and f is the frequency of the photon. Energy, they say, is equivalent to mass according to Einstein's famous formula E = m...