Windows Vista delay no effect says Linux expert

News that the release of Microsoft's new operating system Windows Vista is likely to be pushed back will have no significant effect on the Windows market, according to a leading open source software expert.

Con Zymaris, the CEO of consulting firm Cybersource and a specialist who has worked with Australian governments to develop open source strategies, believes that Microsoft may be able to make its self imposed deadline of Q107 for the Vista release. However, even if it misses by a few months, the Windows market will be unaffected, he says.

A research note from the four main Vista watchers at Gartner, Stephen Kleynhans, David Mitchell Smith, Neil MacDonald, Michael A. Silver, indicates that, based on Microsoft's track record of product releases, it is very unlikely that Vista will be available before the second quarter of next year.

"Microsoft's track record is clear; it consistently misses target dates for major operating system releases. We don't expect broad availability of Windows Vista until at least 2Q07, which is nine to 12 months after Beta 2," the research note states.

However, Zymaris believes the Gartner announcement has no real relevance to the state of play of Windows or for the Linux market.

"I would like to say that it presents a huge gaping opportunity for Linux. However, in reality I don't think it changes the landscape that much," says Zymaris. "Based on on history, Microsoft can bring out one of these desktop operating systems three years late like they did with Windows 2000. It didn't impact them on the desktop. What it boils down to is that you could create a Linux desktop that's ten times as good as Microsoft's but that's still not enough to allow people to jump across because most people are locked in to Windows. Let's face it whenever Vista comes out, if you go out and buy a new notebook, it will have Vista on it." [itwire.com.au]

Comments

US says world safer, despite 11,000 attacks in '05

The U.S. war on terrorism has made the world safer, the State Department's counterterrorism chief said on Friday, despite more than 11,000 terrorist attacks worldwide last year that killed 14,600 people. The U.S. State Department said the numbers, listed in its annual Country Reports on Terrorism released on Friday, were based on a broader definition of terrorism and could not be compared to the 3,129 international attacks listed the previous year. But the new 2005 figures, which showed attacks in Iraq jumped and accounted for about a third of the world's total, may fuel criticism of the Bush administration's assertion that it is winning the fight against terrorism. Asked if the world was safer than the previous year, U.S. State Department Counterterrorism Coordinator Henry Crumpton told a news conference, "I think so. But I think that (if) you look at the ups and downs of this battle, it's going to take us a long time to win this. You can't measure this month ...

Al-Qaeda number two in new video

Al-Qaeda's number two Ayman al-Zawahiri has appeared in a video saying that Iraqi insurgents have "broken the back" of the US military. He praised "martyrdom operations" carried out by al-Qaeda in Iraq in the video, posted on an Islamist website. And he called on the people and army of Pakistan to fight against President Musharraf's administration. This is the third message from prominent al-Qaeda leaders to emerge within a week. A tape from Osama Bin Laden was broadcast on 23 April, followed two days later by a message from Iraqi insurgent Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Pakistan focus Zawahiri, who wore a black turban and a white robe in the video, described the leaders of Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Iraq as traitors, and urged Muslims to "confront them". He praised Iraqi militants, saying that the US, Britain and allies had "achieved nothing but losses, disasters and misfortunes" in Iraq. "Al-Qaeda in Iraq alone has carried out 800 ma...

Does light have mass?

The short answer is "no", but it is a qualified "no" because there are odd ways of interpreting the question which could justify the answer "yes". Light is composed of photons so we could ask if the photon has mass. The answer is then definitely "no": The photon is a massless particle. According to theory it has energy and momentum but no mass and this is confirmed by experiment to within strict limits. Even before it was known that light is composed of photons it was known that light carries momentum and will exert a pressure on a surface. This is not evidence that it has mass since momentum can exist without mass. [ For details see the Physics FAQ article What is the mass of the photon? ]. Sometimes people like to say that the photon does have mass because a photon has energy E = hf where h is Planck's constant and f is the frequency of the photon. Energy, they say, is equivalent to mass according to Einstein's famous formula E = m...

exinfo88

Search This Blog